RESEARCH ARTICLE
- MD. AL AMIN HOSSAIN. 1
- MUNSHI MOHAMMAD KUTUB UDDIN 1
- MD. TANJILUR RAHMAN 2
- MUHAMMAD MANIRUZZAMAN 3
- MD. MASUD RANA 4
- ANISUR RAHAMAN 5
1,5MS student, Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali-8602, Bangladesh. PhD Student, Department of Entomology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali-8602, Bangladesh.
2 MS student, Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali-8602, Bangladesh.
3 Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali-8602, Bangladesh.
4 Department of Agricultural Extension, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali-8602, Bangladesh.
*Corresponding Author: MUNSHI MOHAMMAD KUTUB UDDIN1*,
Citation: MUNSHI MOHAMMAD KUTUB UDDIN1*, Response of Biochar to Plant Nutrients and Yield of Glycine max In Non-saline Tidal Ecosystem, Dietary Nourishment and Food Processing Techniques vol 1(4). DOI: 1https://doi.org/10.64347/3064-7061/DNFPT.019
Copyright: © 2024, MUNSHI MOHAMMAD KUTUB UDDIN1*, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: October 27, 2024 | Accepted: November 05, 2024 | Published: November 29, 2024
Abstract
Biochar is an organic matter produced by gasification used in soil to preserve soil nutrients. Research work was conducted in the field of Patuakhali Science and Technology University from January to May 2018 to observe the effect of biochar on the yield and nutrient conservation ability of soybeans. The research completed four types of soil treatments as Control, 20 t/ha Biochar, Recommended dose of fertilizers, and 20 t ha-1 biochar along with recommended doses of fertilizers. Biochar @ 20 t ha-1 with a combination of fertilizers showed the maximum yield (2.18 t ha-1). The largest amounts of K, Na, Ca, Mg, S, and P were observed from biochar-treated plots of 20 t ha-1. The control plots showed the lowest yield and the lowest amount of K, Na, Ca, Mg, S and P. Biochar @ 20 t ha-1 with a combination of fertilizers could be recommended for higher yield and nutrient conservation in the southern non-saline area of Bangladesh.
Keywords: Biochar, Nutrients, soybean, Yield
Introduction
Soybean (Glycine max L.) grows in tropical, subtropical, and temperate climates. Soybean has many benefits, nutritionally for man and livestock, as well as other industrial and commercial uses. It is classified as an oilseed containing significant amounts of all the essential amino acids, minerals, and vitamins for human nutrition. It is therefore an important source of human dietary protein with an average of 40% content, 30?rbohydrate, and an oil content of 20% (Islam et al., 2019)
Biochar is a porous and highly stable form of charcoal produced by slow pyrolysis of organic wastes such as crop residues. Biochar has the valuable capacity to retain water and nutrients. Moreover, the material offers a conducive habitat for soil microorganisms and, thus can contribute to soil fertility (Kookana et al., 2011). Biochar is used as a soil amendment to increase yields of rice, soybean, corn, and
vegetables (Asai et al., 2009; Vaccari et al., 2011; Yamato et al., 2006). In addition, biochar can also be used to improve topsoil water retention in farmlands, reduce nitrous oxide emissions, balance soil acidity, and increase soil organic carbon (Ginebra et al., 2022). By enhancing soil organic matter, biochar also enhances soil nutrient levels and water availability (Sohi et al., 2010), which in turn contributes to higher crop yields. It reduces the nutrient leaching loss, which in turn can reduce fertilizer needs (Laird et al., 2010; Liang et al., 2006).
The shortage of edible oil has been an acute problem for several years (Khatun et al., 2016). Bangladesh produces 0.358 mt ha-1 of edible while she demands 1.6 million tons (Hossain et al., 2010). To fulfill the demand every year Bangladesh Government has to spend a huge amount of money. As rice is the staple food crop in Bangladesh, the farmers in the southern tidal region follow the rice (transplant aman)-fallow- fallow cropping pattern. However, the area of oil seed crop production can be maximized by utilizing the fallow land.
Soybeans are highly responsive to fertilizer application and hence, it would require a huge amount of nutrient supply through commercial fertilizers. It involves a lot of investment; therefore it is necessary to study the response of soybeans to a wide range of fertility levels in combinations with organic and inorganic sources. The incorporation of chemical fertilizer with organic manures is completely promising not only keeping higher productivity but also providing greater stability in crop production (Nambiar & Abrol, 1989). For the above circumstances, the research was conducted to find the effect of biochar on the yield of soybeans and nutrient conservation in soil.
Methodology
Experimental site
The experiment was conducted at the research field of Patuakhali Science and Technology University. The samples were collected and processed in January 2018 and Laboratory analysis was conducted from May to June 2018 in the Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Central Laboratory of PSTU, Dumki, Patuakhali. Geographically, the experimental area namely Dumki Upazila is 22021¢ N latitude and 90019¢ E longitude, respectively (Figure 1). The study area belongs to the Argo-Ecological Zone of AEZ–13.
Figure 1. Experimental site
Preparation of biochar
Sawdust was used for feedstock or raw materials. The Sawdust was collected from woodcuts from a local sawmill in Dumki. The raw materials were spread on a polythene sheet for sun drying to decrease the water content for two days. The biochar was produced in a biochar stove developed by Shamim et al. (2015) The average residence time was (5 hours) and the highest temperature was >500 0 C. After the pyrolysis process, the biochar will be grounded to pass through a 0.18 mm sieve so that biochar should have the same particle size.
Seed collection
The seeds of soybean (Glycine max) were used as planting materials. The BARI Soybean-6 variety was used.
Soil
The soil of the experiment was silt clay loam having pH > 7.2. It was mildly alkaline and non-saline. The initial soils were collected from each plot after application of treatments before seed sowing and determined the chemical composition of the samples (Table 2).
Experimental treatments and design
In our experiment, we used four (4) treatments. These were: Control, 20 t/ ha biochar, Recommended fertilizers, 20 t/ha biochar, and recommended fertilizers. The BARI recommended fertilizers were Urea-60 kg/ha, TSP-175 kg/ha, MOP-120kg/ha, and Gypsum-115kg/ha. The experiment was laid out in an RCBD (Completely Randomized Block Design) with three replications.
Preparation of soil and plot
From the field, all sorts of stones and bigger particles were moved out manually. A power tiller was used to crumber the soil. The plot with 2.5m x 2m was used for the experiment. Each plot received different rates of biochar and recommended doses of fertilizer. Biochar and all fertilizers were added during the final soil preparation for the plot. A total of twelve (12) plots were filled up by soil or soil with different soil amendments. The moisture content of the soil was maintained at 60% water holding capacity by a manual test. Then plots were kept for 10 days before seed sowing and watered on every alternate day.
Seed sowing of soybean
Seeds were sown on 1 February 2018 in the Rabi season. Seeds were sown in each plot within 1-2 cm depth (approximately) and covered with soil. Necessary shading by rice straw was used to prevent soil moisture until germination.
Irrigation
The plot was moistened to 60% water holding capacity by a manual test. To make the soil 60% moistened, 1000 ml water was used in each plot. All plots were watered evenly and on an "as needed" basis depending on the moisture of the soil.
Intercultural operations
Intercultural operation is mandatory for soybean cultivation. After a week's interval, weeding and irrigation was done in plots during the experiment. During vegetative growth soil born disease and insect infestation were seen in the crops. During reproductive growth, the plot was covered with a net to protect it from birds, especially parrots and doves otherwise it would destroy all the heads of the sunflower and eat all the seeds.
Harvesting and data collection
The crop was harvested in the 2nd week of May. Data were collected on a single plant basis from 10 randomly selected plants of each plot in such a way that the border effect was avoided for high precision. The plot yield was recorded and then the yield was converted to t ha-1.
Collection and processing of soil samples:
The soil samples were collected leveled from 0-15 cm soil depth before seed sowing and after harvesting. Then the collected soil sample was dried and all kinds of dirt, trash, and plant parts. Then it was ground and sieved carefully. After that, the soil samples were dried and kept carefully for further chemical analyses.
Extraction and chemical analysis of nutrients.
For the determination of exchangeable Na, K, Ca, and Mg; the soil was extracted with neutral 1N ammonium acetate (CH3-COO-NH4) following the method outlined by the ammonium acetate extraction method (Jackson, 2005). For the determination of available phosphorus, soil was extracted following Olsen's method. 0.15?lcium chloride (CaCl2) extracting solution was used as an extraction agent for the extraction of available sulfur (Tandon, 2005). The content of phosphorus was measured by spectrophotometer (Model T60 U) at the wavelength of 660nm after 15 minutes after the addition of ascorbic acid (Jackson, 2005). The content of sodium and potassium was determined by a flame photometer (Ghosh et al., 1983). Sulfur was analyzed by the turbidimetric method using a spectrophotometer (Page, 1982). Calcium and Magnesium were analyzed by an Atomic absorption spectrophotometer (APHA, 2012).
Statistical analysis:
The mean values of all the characters were calculated and an analysis of variance was performed by using the ‘Analysis of variance technique’ with the help of the JMP 8 computer program the mean differences were compared by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at a 5% level of significance.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of biochar on seed yield of soybean:
A significant difference was found in the seed yield of soybeans applying different treatments. The biochar with a recommended dose of fertilizer-treated plots produced a higher yield than other treatments. The highest yield (2.18 t/ha) was observed in 20 t/ha biochar and recommended dose of fertilizers. The control plots produced the lowest (1.6 t ha-1) yield (Table 1). Biochar has a positive effect on the yield of Soybeans (Major et al., 2010; Sanvong & Nathewet, 2014; Suppadit et al., 2012). It improves soil properties such as increasing soil micro and macronutrients, reducing nutrient leaching loss, and increasing water-holding capacity (Glaser et al., 2002; Lehmann & Rondon, 2006) which affect on yield of Soybeans.
Table 1: Effect of biochar on yield of soybean
2006) which affect on yield of Soybeans.
Table 1: Effect of biochar on yield of soybean
Treatments | Average yield (t/ha) |
Control | 1.6±0.10c |
20(t/ha) Biochar | 1.8±0.10bc |
Recommended fertilizers | 1.96±0.12ab |
20(t/ha) Biochar and Recommended fertilizers | 2.18±0.02a |
Effect of biochar on Nitrogen (N) content in Soybean field :
The content of nitrogen was significantly difference with different treatments before seed sowing and after harvesting of soybean (Table 2 and Figure 2)
Figure 2. Effect of biochar on nitrogen (N) content in the soil
The highest amount of nitrogen (0.08%) was found in 20 (t/ha) Biochar and Recommended fertilizers treated initial soil (Table 2). Soil nutrients were also determined after harvesting soybeans. In this case, the highest N content (0.046%) was observed in 20 t ha-1 biochar treated plots with a recommended dose of fertilizer, and the lowest N content (0.024%) was observed in control plots.
Table 2: Nutrient status of initial soil (application of treatments before seed sowing)
Nutrients | Treatments | |||
Control | 20 (t/ha) Biochar | Recommended fertilizers | 20 (t/ha) Biochar and Recommended fertilizers | |
Nitrogen (%) | 0.07 | 0.071 | 0.0712 | 0.08 |
Phosphorus (ppm) | 10.2 | 12.14 | 24.31 | 25.2 |
Potassium (meq/100g) | 0.25 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.61 |
Calcium (meq/100g) | 6.8 | 7.4 | 6.86 | 13.2 |
Magnesium (meq/100g) | 4.6 | 4.73 | 4.6 | 8.56 |
Sulphur (ppm) | 2.5 | 2.51 | 12.9 | 15.3 |
From the experiment, it was observed that biochar increased the nitrogen content in the soil. As biochar reduces nutrient leaching (Sika, 2012), the addition of biochar and fertilizer in the soil increases the N content more than needed by plants (Chan et al., 2007; Major et al., 2010; Nelson et al., 2011; Van Zwieten et al., 2010).
Effect of biochar on phosphorus (P) content in the soil :
Soil samples showed significant variation in phosphorus (P) content under various treatments (Table 2). Soil phosphorus was also determined after harvesting Soybeans. In that case, the highest phosphorus (P) content (15.714 ppm) was observed in 20 t ha-1 biochar-treated plots with a recommended dose of fertilizer (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Effect of biochar on phosphorus (P) content in the soil
The lowest phosphorus (P) content (9.506 ppm) was observed in control plots. From the current study, it was found that the addition of biochar increased phosphorus availability in soil and reduced nutrient leaching from soil. Biochar releases phosphorus into the soil (Tryon, 1948). Biochar, when produced at high temperatures (typically above 700°C), retains phosphorus rather than volatilizing it, unlike organic carbon which volatilizes at lower temperatures (around 100°C). This retention of phosphorus in biochar can be beneficial when applied to soil, as it can contribute to increasing phosphorus levels and improving soil fertility over time. This property of biochar makes it a valuable amendment for soil management and agriculture (Ghodszad et al., 2021; Glaser & Lehr, 2019; Li et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2011).
Effect of biochar on potassium (K) content in Soybean field
The content of potassium was significantly difference with different treatments in initial soil (Table 2).
Figure 4. Effect of biochar on potassium (K) content in the soil
Soil potassium was also determined after harvesting Soybean significant difference (p<0>
Effect of biochar on calcium (Ca) content is Soybean field :
Calcium (Ca) levels in the initial soil were found significantly different when varying soil treatments (Table 2). Soil Ca was also determined after harvesting Soybeans and found a significant difference (p<0>
Figure 5. Impact of biochar on sodium (Na) keep in the soil
Effect of biochar on magnesium (Mg) content in the soil :
The magnesium (Mg) availability was significantly different in each treatment in the initial soil (Table 2). A significant difference (p<0>
Figure 6. Effect of biochar on magnesium (Mg) content in the soil
From the experiment, it appeared that the application of biochar in soil increased magnesium availability and reduced nutrient leaching. Magnesium is a highly mobile nutrient element and very susceptible to leaching from soil. Biochar typically has a high cation exchange capacity (CEC) due to its porous structure and negative surface charge. This negative charge attracts positively charged ions (cations) like magnesium (Mg²⁺), holding them on its surface (Chan et al., 2007; Major et al., 2012; Van Zwieten et al., 2010).

Figure 7. Effect of biochar on sulfur (S) content in the soil
Effect of biochar on sulfur (S) content in the soil :
Soil samples collected before seed sowing showed significant variation in sulfur content under various soil treatments (Table 2). Soil sulfur was also determined after harvesting Soybeans and found a significant difference. In that case, the highest sulfur content (49.566 µg gm-1 soil) was observed in biochar-treated plots containing 20 t ha-1 of biochar with a recommended dose of fertilizer, and the lowest sulfur (S) content (19.827 microgram/gm soil) was observed in control plots (Figure 7). From this research, it was noticed that soil sulfur was increased with the application of biochar. The sulfur oxidation or mineralization was increased in the springtime due to the faster warming of soil with the addition of biochar (Stevenson & Cole, 1999). The addition of biochar reduces the extent of SO42- sorption in soil (Johnson, 1984), therefore, the application of biochar and fertilizer in soil might increase the concentration of sulfur in soil. Though it is very difficult to separate the effect of biochar and fertilizers on sulfur content in the soil, it was most likely due to the release of soluble S from both biochar and fertilizers (Gray & Dighton, 2006)..
Conclusion
The maximum yield (2.18 t ha-1) was found in 20 t ha-1 biochar-treated plots with recommended fertilizers. The largest amounts of K, Na, Ca, Mg, S, and P were obtained from biochar-treated plots of 20 t ha-1. The control plots showed the lowest yield and the lowest amount of K, Na, Ca, Mg, S and P. Biochar @ 20 t ha-1 with a combination of fertilizers could be recommended for a higher yield of soybeans and nutrient conservation in the southern non-saline area of Bangladesh .
References
-
APHA. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (E. W. Rice, R. B. Baird, A. D. Eaton, & L. S. Clesceri. (eds.); 22nd ed.). American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Asai, H., Samson, B. K., Stephan, H. M., Songyikhangsuthor, K., Homma, K., Kiyono, Y., Inoue, Y., Shiraiwa, T., & Horie, T. (2009). Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research, 111(1–2), 81–84.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Chan, K. Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A., & Joseph, S. (2007). Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Research, 45(8), 629–634.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Ghodszad, L., Reyhanitabar, A., Maghsoodi, M. R., Lajayer, B. A., & Chang, S. X. (2021). Biochar affects the fate of phosphorus in soil and water: A critical review. Chemosphere, 283, 131176.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Ghosh, A. B., Bajaj, J. C., Hasan, R., & Singh, D. (1983). Soil and water testing methods: a laboratory manual. In IARI, New Delhi.
--> -
Ginebra, M., Muñoz, C., Calvelo-Pereira, R., Doussoulin, M., & Zagal, E. (2022). Biochar impacts on soil chemical properties, greenhouse gas emissions and forage productivity: A field experiment. Science of the Total Environment, 806, 150465.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002). Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35, 219–230.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Glaser, B., & Lehr, V.-I. (2019). Biochar effects on phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9338.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Gray, D. M., & Dighton, J. (2006). Mineralization of forest litter nutrients by heat and combustion. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(6), 1469–1477.
--> -
Hossain, M. K., Strezov, V., Chan, K. Y., & Nelson, P. F. (2010). Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chemosphere, 78(9), 1167–1171.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Islam, I., Adam, Z., & Islam, S. (2019). Soybean (Glycine Max): alternative sources of human nutrition and bioenergy for the 21st century. Am. J. Food Sci. Technol, 7, 1–6.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Jackson, M. L. (2005). Soil chemical analysis: advanced course: a manual of methods useful for instruction and research in soil chemistry, physical chemistry of soils, soil fertility, and soil genesis. UW-Madison Libraries parallel press.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Khatun, M., Hossain, T. M. B., Miah, M. A. M., Khandoker, S., & Rashid, M. A. (2016). Profitability of sunflower cultivation in some selected sites of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 41(4), 599–623.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Kookana, R. S., Sarmah, A. K., Van Zwieten, L., Krull, E., & Singh, B. (2011). Biochar application to soil. agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences. In Advances in Agronomy (1st ed., Vol. 112). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385538-1.00003-2
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Laird, D., Fleming, P., Wang, B., Horton, R., & Karlen, D. (2010). Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma, 158(3–4), 436–442.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2015). Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In Biochar for environmental management (pp. 1–13). Routledge.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Lehmann, J., & Rondon, M. (2006). Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems, 113(517), e530.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Li, H., Li, Y., Xu, Y., & Lu, X. (2020). Biochar phosphorus fertilizer effects on soil phosphorus availability. Chemosphere, 244, 125471.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O’Neill, B., Skjemstad, J. O., Thies, J., Luizão, F. J., Petersen, J., & Neves, E. G. (2006). Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5), 1719–1730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0383
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Major, J., Rondon, M., Molina, D., Riha, S. J., & Lehmann, J. (2010). Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant and Soil, 333(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0327-0
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Major, J., Steiner, C., Downie, A., & Lehmann, J. (2012). Biochar effects on nutrient leaching. In Biochar for environmental management (pp. 303–320).
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Nambiar, K. K. M., & Abrol, I. P. (1989). Long term fertiliser experiments in India. An overview.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Nelson, N. O., Agudelo, S. C., Yuan, W., & Gan, J. (2011). Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in biochar-amended soils. Soil Science, 176(5), 218–226.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
https://search.proquest.com/openview/8f806314e7ab25427dbb1353e2b478b4/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
--> -
APHA. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (E. W. Rice, R. B. Baird, A. D. Eaton, & L. S. Clesceri. (eds.); 22nd ed.). American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. 2. Asai, H., Samson, B. K., Stephan, H. M., Songyikhangsuthor, K., Homma, K., Kiyono, Y., Inoue, Y., Shiraiwa, T., & Horie, T. (2009). Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research, 111(1–2), 81–84. 3. Chan, K. Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A., & Joseph, S. (2007). Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Research, 45(8), 629–634. 4. Ghodszad, L., Reyhanitabar, A., Maghsoodi, M. R., Lajayer, B. A., & Chang, S. X. (2021). Biochar affects the fate of phosphorus in soil and water: A critical review. Chemosphere, 283, 131176. 5. Ghosh, A. B., Bajaj, J. C., Hasan, R., & Singh, D. (1983). Soil and water testing methods: a laboratory manual. In IARI, New Delhi. 6. Ginebra, M., Muñoz, C., Calvelo-Pereira, R., Doussoulin, M., & Zagal, E. (2022). Biochar impacts on soil chemical properties, greenhouse gas emissions and forage productivity: A field experiment. Science of the Total Environment, 806, 150465. 7. Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002). Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35, 219–230. 8. Glaser, B., & Lehr, V.-I. (2019). Biochar effects on phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9338. 9. Gray, D. M., & Dighton, J. (2006). Mineralization of forest litter nutrients by heat and combustion. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(6), 1469–1477. 10. Hossain, M. K., Strezov, V., Chan, K. Y., & Nelson, P. F. (2010). Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chemosphere, 78(9), 1167–1171. 11. Islam, I., Adam, Z., & Islam, S. (2019). Soybean (Glycine Max): alternative sources of human nutrition and bioenergy for the 21st century. Am. J. Food Sci. Technol, 7, 1–6. 12. Jackson, M. L. (2005). Soil chemical analysis: advanced course: a manual of methods useful for instruction and research in soil chemistry, physical chemistry of soils, soil fertility, and soil genesis. UW-Madison Libraries parallel press. 13. Khatun, M., Hossain, T. M. B., Miah, M. A. M., Khandoker, S., & Rashid, M. A. (2016). Profitability of sunflower cultivation in some selected sites of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 41(4), 599–623. 14. Kookana, R. S., Sarmah, A. K., Van Zwieten, L., Krull, E., & Singh, B. (2011). Biochar application to soil. agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences. In Advances in Agronomy (1st ed., Vol. 112). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385538-1.00003-2 15. Laird, D., Fleming, P., Wang, B., Horton, R., & Karlen, D. (2010). Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma, 158(3–4), 436–442. 16. Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2015). Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In Biochar for environmental management (pp. 1–13). Routledge. 17. Lehmann, J., & Rondon, M. (2006). Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. Biological Approaches to Sustainable Soil Systems, 113(517), e530. 18. Li, H., Li, Y., Xu, Y., & Lu, X. (2020). Biochar phosphorus fertilizer effects on soil phosphorus availability. Chemosphere, 244, 125471. 19. Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O’Neill, B., Skjemstad, J. O., Thies, J., Luizão, F. J., Petersen, J., & Neves, E. G. (2006). Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5), 1719–1730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0383 20. Major, J., Rondon, M., Molina, D., Riha, S. J., & Lehmann, J. (2010). Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant and Soil, 333(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0327-0 21. Major, J., Steiner, C., Downie, A., & Lehmann, J. (2012). Biochar effects on nutrient leaching. In Biochar for environmental management (pp. 303–320). 22. Nambiar, K. K. M., & Abrol, I. P. (1989). Long term fertiliser experiments in India. An overview. 23. Nelson, N. O., Agudelo, S. C., Yuan, W., & Gan, J. (2011). Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in biochar-amended soils. Soil Science, 176(5), 218–226. 24. https://search.proquest.com/openview/8f806314e7ab25427dbb1353e2b478b4/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y 25. Sanvong, C., & Nathewet, P. (2014). A Comparative Study of Pelleted Broiler Litter Biochar Derived from Lab-Scale Pyrolysis Reactor with that Resulted from 200-Liter-Oil Drum Kiln to Ameliorate the Relations between Physicochemical Properties of Soil with Lower Organic Matter Soil and Soybe. EnvironmentAsia, 7(1).
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Shamim, M. I. A., Uddin, N., Hossain, S. A. A. M., Ruhul, A., & HIEMSTRA, T. (2015). Production of biochar for soil application: a comparative study of three kiln models. Pedosphere, 25(5), 696–702.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Sika, M. P. (2012). Effect of biochar on chemistry, nutrient uptake and fertilizer mobility in sandy soil. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010). A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy, 105, 47–82.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Stevenson, F. J., & Cole, M. A. (1999). Cycles of soils: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients. John Wiley & Sons.
--> -
Suppadit, T., Phumkokrak, N., & Poungsuk, P. (2012). The effect of using quail litter biochar on soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) production. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 72(2), 244.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Tandon, H. L. S. (2005). Methods of analysis of soils, plants, waters, fertilisers & organic manures.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Tryon, E. H. (1948). Effect of charcoal on certain physical, chemical, and biological properties of forest soils. Ecological Monographs, 18(1), 81–115.
--> -
Vaccari, F. P., Baronti, S., Lugato, E., Genesio, L., Castaldi, S., Fornasier, F., & Miglietta, F. (2011). Biochar as a strategy to sequester carbon and increase yield in durum wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 34(4), 231–238. 34. Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Downie, A., Morris, S., Petty, S., Rust, J., & Chan, K. Y. (2010). A glasshouse study on the interaction of low mineral ash biochar with nitrogen in a sandy soil. Soil Research, 48(7), 569–576. 35.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Downie, A., Morris, S., Petty, S., Rust, J., & Chan, K. Y. (2010). A glasshouse study on the interaction of low mineral ash biochar with nitrogen in a sandy soil. Soil Research, 48(7), 569–576.
Publisher | Google Scholor -
Yamato, M., Okimori, Y., Wibowo, I. F., Anshori, S., & Ogawa, M. (2006). Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 52(4), 489–495
-->